Cliff's
GROUND
ZERO
Terrorism
Diaries
SUNDAY,
January
6,
2002—Ground
Zero
Plus
117
Terror
Of
The
GoatSucker
by
Cliff
McKenzie
Editor,
New
York
City
Combat
Correspondent
News
The
GoatSucker
monster
invaded
my
grandson’s
apartment
last
night.
He
wasn’t
afraid.
His
Sentinel
of
Vigilance,
Buzz
LightYear,
was
there
to
protect
him.
And,
he
was
backed
up
by
his
three-year-old
sister,
Sarah.
My
wife
and
I
were
babysitting
the
grandkids
while
our
daughter
and
her
husband
enjoyed
a
movie.
I
was
tired,
battling
a
cold
and
severe
sinus
leakage,
but
fought
the
desire
to
lie
down
on
the
couch
and
sleep
to
play
with
my
five-year-old
grandson’s
vivid
imagination.
To
understand
the
impact
of
Terrorism,
it
is
necessary
to
“walk
in
the
moccasins”
of
those
you
are
trying
to
protect.
Since
my
ultimate
goal
is
to
help
parents
and
guardians
of
children
remain
vigilant
over
the
insidious
nature
of
Terrorism
in
a
child,
“being
with
him”
overruled
my
desire
for
rest.
I
crawled
down
on
the
floor
where
Matt
had
spread
out
all
his
dinosaurs
and
Buzz
LightYear
toys,
and
we
began
to
play
“bad
over
good.”
Freud
said
life
was
all
about
conflict.
Newton
said
for
every
action
there’s
an
equal
and
opposite
reaction.
For
“good”
to
exist
there
must
be
a
backboard
for
its
presence—that
of
“bad.”
For
every
ying,
there
must
be
a
yang.
Matt,
like
any
child,
loves
to
play
games.
In
each
game,
there
is
a
“winner”
and
a
“loser.”
Even
in
his
most
favorite
children’s
show
on
television—“Little
Bear”—there
is
some
conflict,
some
tension,
some
thread
of
a
threat
or
obstacle
that
must
be
overcome
for
victory
to
rise
out
of
the
ashes
of
“fear,”
“intimidation,”
and
“complacency.”
When
Little
Bear’s
friends
eat
all
the
goodies
he
is
taking
to
his
grandparents’
house,
there
is
that
“fear”
within
him
that
his
grandparents
will
be
“sad”
that
his
gifts
are
gone.
The
fear
is
removed
by
elation
of
the
grandparents
to
see
Little
Bear,
regardless
of
the
gifts.
But,
during
the
last
legs
of
the
journey,
the
“fear”
mounts.
Terrorism
takes
tiny
forms
in
many
cases,
and
if
not
resolved,
can
grow
into
a
September
11th.
Even
Richard
Scarry,
one
of
the
more
prolific
children’s
book
authors,
has
his
characters
fighting
fires
in
the
bakery,
or
fixing
things
that
might
“hurt”
others.
Life
is
all
about
“policing”
the
“bad”
to
allow
the
“good”
to
prosper.
It
is
like
pulling
weeds
so
they
don’t
choke
out
the
growth
of
the
new,
the
innocent,
the
unprotected.
So
as
my
grandson
and
I
played
the
“bad”
and
“evil
ones”
versus
the
“good”
and
“virtuous
ones,”
there
was
a
point
where
“bad”
appeared
to
overcome
“good.”
That’s
where
the
GoatSucker
came
in.
Earlier
in
the
day
we
had
been
drawing
pictures
from
a
book
of
Monsters.
It
was
designed
to
teach
the
rudiments
of
drawing—and,
one
of
the
pictures
was
of
a
“GoatSucker.”
Matt
loved
it,
and
did
a
wonderful
replica
of
it.
Sarah
colored
it
in.
By
happenstance,
my
wife
and
I
knew
the
myth
of
Chupacabra—the
legendary
GoatSucker
reported
to
exist
in
Latin
America. We
even
went
to
Google
on
the
Internet
and
downloaded
the
history
of
it.
|
Allegedly
the
chupacabra
is
a
dog-sized
creature
with
a
bull-like
head,
small
feet
and
smooth
skin
like
that
of
a
bat.
It
is
reported
to
have
long
claws
and
a
crocodile-like
crest
running
down
its
back.
It
kills
sheep
and
supposedly
sucks
of
their
blood.
During
our
“mock”
battle
between
“good”
and
“bad,”
the
GoatSucker
seemed
to
be
winning.
I
kept
urging
Matt
that
the
“good
guys”
had
to
win.
He
kept
reminding
me
that
they
would,
but
the
“bad
guys”
had
“sucked
their
power”
from
them,
and
made
them
“weak.”
He
made
a
little
“prison”
out
of
three
blocks,
in
which
Buzz
LightYear
and
his
band
of
“good
guys”
were
trapped,
powerless
to
protect
themselves
against
the
dinosaurs
who
guarded
them,
or
the
“evil
GoatSuckers”
flying
overhead.
(His
spaceship
full
of
the
“bad
guys”
had
come
from
a
McDonald’s
Happy
Meal.)
I
went
along
with
him
in
a
concerned
way,
wondering
at
what
point
“good
would
overcome.”
As
with
any
good
story,
I
grew
impatient
that
“evil”
would win, and my grandchild would not re-learn a critical
message about how the Plus in life overpowers the Minus. I wanted to
“insist” good would win, but checked myself. If I had any trust in his
ability to decide for himself which would win, I had to wait until the
last chapter.
Finally, he decided we should build the “sanctuary.” He
pulled out a plastic bag and spread out a toy grotto. It had waterfalls
and trees and rocks and deer and squirrels and frogs and palm trees.
Heading the pack of little figures was a Prince on a White
Horse, and his trusty Princess. They were the Guardians of Paradise. No
“evil” was allowed in.
He placed all the “bad” figures around the grotto, and turned
the Prince toward them. “See, G-Pa, everyone is safe in here. Even from
the GoatSucker!”
|
I
felt
a
glow.
There
had
been
moments
earlier
when
I
wondered
if
the
idea
of
Terrorism
dominated
his
thinking—the
idea
of
bad
winning
out
over
good.
But
in
the
last
chapter
of
his
imaginary
book,
there
was
a
Paradise,
a
Sanctuary,
in
which
all
the
good
found
respite,
where
peace
and
security
dominated,
where
the
innocent
deer
and
frogs
and
squirrels
and
nubile
trees
could
enjoy
life
without
fear,
intimidation
or
complacency.
More
importantly,
it
was
guarded
by
the
Prince
and
Princess.
Matt
carefully
set
his
Sentinel
of
Vigilance
facing
the
beasts
trying
to
enter
his
sanctuary.
Once,
when
I
tried
to
get
a
dinosaur
to
knock
over
a
tree,
Matt
countered
that
was
impossible.
“G-Pa!
This
is
the
safe
place.
The
dinosaurs
aren’t
real
here.
They
are
turned
to
stone.
They
can’t
move.”
I
tipped
the
dinosaur
on
its
side
and
watched
Matt
arrange
the
rocks
and
trees
and
creatures
as
though
he
was
the
hand
of
God
creating
the
Garden
of
Eden.
“What
about
the
GoatSucker?”
I
asked,
testing
his
resolve.
“He’s
not
really
real,
G-Pa.
Bad
isn’t
really
real.
It’s
pretend.”
I
looked
at
the
imaginary
GoatSucker.
It
had
stricken
mock
fear
at
first
in
all
the
toys.
It
had
been
vicious
and
mean
and
dominated
all
the
land
for
a
while.
Now,
in
a
child’s
mind,
it
lay
discarded
on
the
side
of
the
sanctuary,
writhing,
powerless
to
penetrate
the
security
of
the
grotto.
Matt
had
intuitively
fought
Terrorism
and
won.
He
saw
it
as
a
“pretend”
reality—something
that
could
be
as
quickly
shut
down
as
blinking
an
eye.
But,
what
had
strength
and
longevity,
was
the
sanctuary—the
home
of
the
good.
And,
he
was
wise
enough
at
five,
to
know
the
sanctuary
had
to
be
protected.
The
White
Knight
on
his
horse,
and
his
Princess,
stood
guard
at
the
door
to
the
Kingdom.
In
reserve
was
a
magical
unicorn,
there
to
give
them
power
to
fight
all
evil.
I
wondered
how
many
parents
knew
that
inside
a
child’s
mind
was
a
sanctuary.
It
was
a
place
a
child
found
safety
in
when
the
fear
and
intimidation
of
life
grew
disproportionate
to
the
reality
around
him
or
her.
Matt
exposed
his
in
play.
Some
children
never
get
that
chance
to
share
their
sanctuary
because
a
parent
often
forgets
to
“walk
in
the
moccasins”
of
the
child’s
need
to
know
there
is
a
“safe
place”
to
go
when
the
“evil”
of
the
world
seems
to
dominate.
The
principle
of
becoming
a
Parent
of
Vigilance,
or
a
Citizen
of
Vigilance,
is
nothing
more
than
constantly
recognizing
the
need
for
a
child
to
feel
“safe
within.”
It
is
about
building
up
the
defenses
of
the
“sanctuary
of
the
mind.”
It
is
about
making
sure
the
child
feels
and
knows
there
is
a
“guardian”
protecting
him
or
her
from
the
“evil
without.”
|
Unprotected children may forget there is sanctuary.
They may never find a safe place, and their lives may be ruled
by fear, intimidation and complacency. But if a
parent or loved one believes in the need for Semper Vigilantes—Always
Vigilant—he or she or they will promote the sanctuary within
a child.
They will insure the GoatSuckers of the world end up powerless
and discarded, because they will know that all evil, in the
final analysis, is “pretend.”
Go
To Daily Diary, Jan. 5-SNOW--THE PURIFICATION OF TERRORISM
©2001
- 2004, VigilanceVoice.com, All rights reserved - a ((HYYPE))
design
|
|