GROUND
ZERO,
Oct.
19,
New
York
City—The
New
York
Post
headlines
screamed
the
words:
NO FEAR!
Next
to the
headline
was
a picture
of Lisa
Beamer,
whose
husband
led
the
passengers
against
the
Terrorists
on Fight
93 that
crashed
in Pennsylvania.
The
sub
headline
read:
“Our
leaders
fled
the
House,
but
Lisa
Beamer
sets
a different
example.”
I didn’t
want
to laugh
at the
government
for
fleeing
under
a mere
anthrax
scare.
Instead,
I cheered
Lisa
Beamer’s
courage
and
thought
of the
irony
of it
all.
Here
is a
pregnant
woman
flying
on the
same
flight
her
husband
took
September
11 when
he rallied
other
passengers
to thwart
the
Terrorists’
plans
to either
crash
into
the
White
House,
the
Capitol
or collide
with
Air
Force
One.
And
here
is the
entire
representative
government
of the
most
powerful
nation
on earth
cowering
and
hiding
from
a mere
scare!
Semper
Vigilantes,
Lisa
Beamer.
Yes,
Always
Vigilant,
I thought.
At the
moment
I was
lauding
Lisa
Beamer,
I was
feeling
empty
and
desolate
about
my faith
in the
courage
of government
to deal
with
homefront
issues—like
helping
average
citizens—parents,
grandparents,
uncles,
aunts,
nieces,
nephews
and
children—fight
fear
with
courage.
I knew
that
Terrorism
feeds
on fear
and
intimidation,
and
if our
entire
representative
government
ran
for
cover
at the
mere
threat
of a
terrorist
intrusion,
what
did
that
signal
the
country?
Thank
God,
I thought,
the
Senate
stayed
in session.
At least
they
had
the
common
sense
and
decency
not
to show
how
pitiful
all
of government
can
be.
Congress’
retreat
to the
“high
ground”
was
a brutal
lesson
for
all
of us.
It tells
us whom
we should
count
on when
the
chips
are
down.
If the
government
is going
to run
away
in the
face
of possible
fear,
then
who
will
protect
us from
FEAR
itself?
I vote
for
Lisa
Beamer
over
Congress.
Yet
there
are
many
individuals
who
look
to government
to protect
them,
and
their
families
from
Terrorism’s
threat.
They
presume
the
government
is resolving
the
problem
with
bombs,
bullets
and
Home
Security
legislation
designed
to strip
of us
of basic
rights
so the
“government”
can
protect
us.
Is this
the
same
government
that
ran
away
today(Oct.
19)--
the
government
to whom
we are
willing
to sacrifice
many
of our
inalienable
rights
to protect
us from
Terrorism?
I felt
chills
up my
spine
thinking
of the
paradox—the
frightened
leaders
are
going
to save
the
courageous
people
from
fear’s
harm!
I began
to think
about
what
it meant
when
the
Representatives
of the
People
rush
out
in fear
over
a scare--a
mere
threat.
It brings
up a
vital
question:
Who
comes
first--the
politicians
or the
people?
I wondered
what
image
the
Congress
left
in the
minds
of future
Terrorists
as they
bailed
out
in a
rush
of personal
selfishness.
Would
the
future
Terrorists
smirk,
realizing
a mere
scare
could
drive
the
United
States
government
into
hiding?
Perhaps
I was
too
rash,
I thought.
Maybe
one
lonely
Congressperson
didn’t
flee
with
his
or her
tail
between
his
or legs.
I searched
the
papers
for
that
one
Congressional
Representative
who
refused
to leave
the
Chambers—the
one
that
sat
there
until
the
guards
had
to lift
him
or her
out
of the
seat
screaming
and
kicking.
I hoped
to find
one
representative
Voice
of dissent
amongst
the
fleeing
sheep.
No where
could
I find
a photo
or story
depicting
a Congressperson
clutching
his
or her
chair,
fighting
those
who
tried
to eject
him
or her.
What
a photo
op,
I thought.
Yet
FEAR
overpowered
political
savvy.
Cowardice
ruled
Vigilance.
Not
one
kicking,
screaming,
fighting-for-faith-rather-than-promoting
FEAR
Congressperson
could
be seen
on the
news
pages
or television.
Of course,
I can
hardly
wait
to hear
those
Congressional
Representatives
who
will
puff
out
their
chests
and
crow
how
much
they
were
against
the
decision
to close
the
House,
and
how
they
wanted
to stay
and
work
and
show
America’s
people
and
the
world
they
couldn’t
be intimidated.
But
that’s
all
cheap
rhetoric.
If any
politician
felt
that
strongly,
they
would
have
had
to carry
them
out
kicking
and
screaming.
Our
nation’s
leaders
abandoned
us—those
are
the
facts.
With,
of course,
the
exception
of Lisa
Beamer.
She
grabbed
hold
of her
Fear,
held
it captive,
and
climbed
aboard
former
United
Flight
93 in
Newark
heading
for
San
Francisco.
The
fear
she
faced
was
ten-fold
greater
than
the
anthrax
scare
that
scattered
our
politicians.
Lisa
Beamer
chose
Courage,
Conviction
and
Action
rather
than
to fall
victim
to Fear,
Intimidation
and
Complacency
as our
Congress
did.
That’s
why
Americans
can’t
count
on government
to fight
Terrorism.
Not
on the
homefront.
Certainly,
they
can
bomb
and
hunt
and
execute
Terrorists
from
afar,
but
Terrorism
is a
state
of mind.
It is
the
fear
of attack
that
must
be fought
in the
homeland.
It is
the
fear
Terrorism
instills
in a
child
that
must
be countered
with
the
weapons
of Courage
and
Conviction
that
Lisa
Beamer
illustrated
when
she
boarded
her
husband’s
ill-fated
flight
to show
the
world
facing
rather
than
running
from
fear
is the
key
to conquering
it.
I would
like
to nominate
Lisa
Beamer
as the
Semper
Vigilantes
Mother
Of The
Year!
I’d
like
to make
her
the
head
of the
Parents
of Vigilance
movement.
She
knows
what
it takes
to tell
a child
to not
be afraid.
She
set
the
example
of Courage,
and
Congress
set
the
example
of Cowardice
in the
face
of Fear.
I wonder
if Speaker
Dennis
Hastret
asked
himself
before
he shut
down
Congress:
“Is
the
closing
of Congress
going
to have
a positive
or negative
effect
on the
fear
of our
nation’s
children?”
I’m
afraid
he didn’t.
If he
had
bottom-lined
that
question,
he would
have
kept
Congress
open.
But
I’ll
bet
that
Lisa
Beamer
asked
the
question:
“What
will
my children
think
of their
mother
if I
don’t
show
them
how
to face
fear
with
courage?”
I think
Lisa
boarded
the
plane
for
all
the
children,
and
Congress
ran
away
because
children
weren’t
their
concern.
And
I wondered
if Speaker
Hastret
thought
about
Lisa
Beamer’s
32-year
old
husband,
Todd,
and
how
he and
other
citizens
aboard
Fight
93 sacrificed
themselves
to save
the
lives
of many
of the
Congresspeople
who
ran
at the
threat
of a
“possible”
anthrax
scare.
Todd
Beamer’s
final
words
have
been
immortalized
in the
press
and
history.
The
last
thing
he said
to his
wife
on the
phone
before
the
United
Flight
93 crashed
into
a field
in Shanksville,
Pa.,
on September
11 was
his
battle
cry:
“Are
you
guys
ready?
Let’s
roll…”
I wonder
how
many
Congresspeople
thought
about
Todd
Beamer’s
courage
in the
face
of death
when
he and
others
protected
the
plane
from
crashing
into
the
White
House,
or perhaps
the
U.S.
Capitol?
Todd
Beamer,
and
the
other
forty-three
passengers
on Fight
93,
didn’t
think
their
lives
were
worth
more
than
any
others.
If they
had,
they
would
probably
have
sat
quietly
and
not
attacked
the
Terrorists
to save
Speaker
Hastret
or other
U.S.
elected
representatives.
Yet
today,
Congress
sent
the
signal
that
their
lives
were
more
important
than
their
constituents’
lives.
They
sent
the
message
they,
as our
leaders,
aren’t
willing
to die
for
us—as
the
citizens
of Flight
93 were
willing
to die
for
them.
Shame.
Such
shame.
It appears
to me
that
our
Congress
is not
the
staunch
source
of Protection
we should
look
upon
to battle
Terrorism.
Those
among
us who
believe
government
has
the
power,
the
will
and
fortitude
to resolve
the
issue
of Terrorism
need
to look
at an
empty
house
of Congress
and
rethink
the
will
of government.
They
need
to realize
that
the
government
has
ample
supplies
of antibiotics
to cure
anyone
infected
in Congress,
while
most
of the
nation’s
hospitals
suffer
from
a lack
of them.
Yet,
even
with
the
cure
to any
exposure
readily
available,
Congress
turned
and
ran
away
from
its
citizens.
This
brings
up some
serious
questions
each
parent
needs
to answer
about
who
is in
charge
of their
children’s
safety
in the
face
of fear.
Do the
parents
of America
really
believe
their
congressional
leaders
would
throw
their
body
in front
of their
children
if threatened?
Do you
think
Dennis
Hastret
would
throw
his
body
in front
of your
child
and
take
a Terrorist
bullet,
or would
he run
the
other
way?
If the
Congress
is so
frightened
to shut
down
its
doors
over
an anthrax
scare,
what
protection
will
they
insure
the
mothers
and
fathers
of America
if and
when
Terrorism
kicks
up again
in our
country?
Todd
Beamer
knew
what
to do.
He knew
how
to die
for
what
he believed.
That’s
why
I urge
you
all
to look
at yourselves
as the
Government
Of The
Children
and
not
to Washington
D.C.
If there
is going
to be
a Home
Security
force
within
this
country,
let’s
not
put
it in
the
hands
of government.
Based
on today’s
behavior,
who
really
thinks
the
government
has
the
conviction
or courage
to provide
security
for
our
children,
our
neighborhoods,
our
communities?
Instead,
let
Congress’
actions
be a
lesson
in parental
management.
Let
its
fleeing
be reason
for
you
to deeply
consider
becoming
part
of the
Parents
Of Vigilance.
Join
others
throughout
your
community
who
realize
the
true
Home
Security
of your
community
is dependent
on
parents’
not
government’s
vigilance
over
Fear,
Intimidation
and
Complacency.
Use
the
principles
of Semper
Vigilantes
to create
a grass
roots
wave
of the
same
degree
of Courage,
Conviction
and
Action
that
Lisa
Beamer
showed
today
when
she
boarded
her
flight
of fear,
and
looked
Terrorism
in the
eye
rather
than
run
from
it.
Think
of Todd
Beamer
giving
his
life,
and
those
other
brave
Parents
of Vigilance
aboard
Flight
93 who
saved
our
government
and
its
officials
a horrible
death—who
were
willing
to die
for
their
Congressmen
and
Congresswomen,
for
their
President
and
Vice
President.
Then
decide
who
should
govern
your
children’s
future
protection.
Should
it be
the
government,
or,
the
Sentinels
of Vigilance?
Chose
one
or the
other,
otherwise
you’ll
be running
from
your
responsibility
as Congress
did
today.
Cliff McKenzie,
Semper Vigilantes!
Go
To: "Sentinels Of Vigilance Created From Rubble"
©2001
- 2004, VigilanceVoice.com, All rights reserved - a ((HYYPE))
design
|