ZERO PLUS 1218 DAYS,--New York, NY, Monday, January
12, 2005--The Terrorism
Buck doesn't stop at the top. The bottom of the quagmire is
its most comfortable home.
American military police are on trial for torturing
prisoners in Iraq's infamous jail Saddam Hussein used to humiliate,
tyrannize and oppress his 25 million people.
Abu gharib prison
The world revolted when photos of prisoners wired
with what looked like electrical shock paraphernalia and placed
in humiliating postures while naked were broadcast around the
Public relations sucked a sour breath that day,
for the idea that America was "better than" the enemy
was crushed by the actions of a few guards who, ill-trained
in the rules of modern war, never thought for a moment private
actions become public withthe click of a digital camera battery.
Now, those troops are on trial.
They are being charged with a litany of crimes,
the worst being that they acted on their own, without any encouragement
or direction from "above."
Their defense, however, is the opposite. They
claim they were given "directly indirect" orders to
do what they wanted to the prisoners, "just don't kill
In other words, the Terrorism Buck stops at their
That bothers me.
A veteran of Vietnam and more than 100 combat
operations, I witnessed the horrors of war in many venues, including
the brutal, ghastly torture of prisoners. In my own case, they
were virtually beaten to near-death then shot in the back of
the head to put them out of the final gasp of their misery.
I witnessed the horrors of war in many venues
Compared with my own personal experiences, the
actions taken by American guards in Iraq were kindergarten in
comparison to my own measure of what is "torture."
However, the grounds for abuse run thin when a
nation is seeking to elevate and isolate itself as the "Sentinel
of Vigilance" and not become the "Beast of Terror"
I liken what is happening in the trial of the
military police to parents looking at themselves in befuddlement
as their child is being handcuffed and hauled off by the police
for some terrible crime. They look into the other's eyes and
say, "But how could this happen. He's a good kid."
There is a huge Vigilance Gap between the parent
and child in the above situation. Along the way, the parents
had a blind eye to the actions of the child, or, simply didn't
care. While they might have thought they knew the child, whatever
knowledge they held was paper thin.
The true child was screaming inside and ultimately
If you want
to find out what a child will be like when he or she grows
up, follow him or her home
So, who is responsible for the child's actions?
Some will claim without a blink of an eye it is the parents.
There is a saying that claims if you want to know what a child
will be like when he or she grows up, follow the child home.
It can be assured the parents in the scenario
weren't Parents of Vigilance. If they were, they wouldn't have
been shocked or surprised that their child's Beast of Terror
erupted. Had they been truly Vigilant parents, they would have
corrected those potential flaws in the child's character long
ago, either eliminating or reducing the chances of the child
letting his or her Beast Character rage.
In the trial of the Americans, they are the children
of the military. Some "parent" of theirs let them
alone in a prison without warning them that their Beast of Terror
thrives when the power to abuse others isn't checked.
When told that prisoners are "Terrorists"
and your own troops are being killed by "their brothers
and sisters," there is a great danger that the humanity
and civilized nature of that prisoner evaporates quickly. What
is left is the sinew of a horrible Beast of Terror, worthy of
the worst possible treatment since it is inhuman to begin with.
When I first went into combat I felt sick every
time we killed the "enemy" and found that the bodies
were collateral damage. After many months of combat, the stench
of death was perfumed by a dulling of morality. The soul thickens
and hardens as bodies pile upon bodies.
This is certainly not an excuse for inhumane actions,
but it is an explanation. It is also a signal that above the
front line where the generals sit, high up in the ozone of leadership,
is poised not only the directors and conductors of war, but
those most responsible for its conduct.
is noted to have popularized "The Buck Stops Here"
Harry Truman is noted to have popularized the
political responsibility that "the buck stops here."
He elected to drop the atomic bomb on two cities in Japan, killing
tens of thousands of civilians. His justification was that such
brutality and violence against the innocent would reduce the
deaths of countless more than it took that day.
One might argue the guards in the Iraqi prisons
were following the Harry Truman policy: they were performing
torturous acts against the few in hopes of saving the many.
But they are sergeants and privates on trial,
they are not the President of the United States.
Allegedly, no one is above the law in a free democracy.
Equally, no one is below the law either.
The absence of any charges levied above the guards
in the prison is a clear example that the bar of ethical, moral
and legal responsibility has been lowered to the dungeons. The
upper levels of leadership have ducked and weaved, hoping to
heap upon the children the sins of the parents.
I regret the Buck of Terrorism has sunk to such
a low level.
I hope those who shoved it away from them and
stomped it down, do so also.
are needed to support the VigilanceVoice. Send $1
or more, either through PayPal below, or in cash or check. You can also
help by investing in a local ad in your community paper promoting the
Principles of Vigilance and how to overcome
Go to Donation Page
For More Information