Article Overview:
The Indians are banishing those members who Dance With The Beast of
Terror. Is banishing someone who commits a crime right or
wrong? Does it protect our children from the Beast?
Find out. |
VigilanceVoice
Sunday,
January 18, 2004—Ground Zero Plus 858
___________________________________________________________
Banishing Those Who Dance With The Beast of Terror
___________________________________________________________
by
Cliff McKenzie
Editor, VigilanceVoice.com
|
GROUND ZER0, New York, N.Y.--Jan. 18, 2004 --
The American Indian tribes are using an ancient remedy to battle the
Beast of Terror on a number of reservations. Their
solution is banishment, exile, ejection from the community.
|
Sign
put
up
by
the
Lummi
tribe
in
Bellingham,
Wash.
to
help
eradicate
addiction
and
crime |
Two
tribes
are
employing
the
harshest
of
all
penalties
against
those
who
violate
tribal
policy
such
as
selling
drugs.
They
are
excommunicating
the
persons
from
all
elements
of
the
community,
including
eviction
from
their
homes
and
cutting
off
their
rights
to
any
payments
or
subsidies.
They
are
stripping
the
violators
of
their
rights
of
Indian
citizenship,
a
harsh
and
often
brutal
retaliation
against
the
growing
need
to
stabilize
the
culture
within
tribes
away
from
crime
and
toward
more
community.
According
to
the
New
York
Times,
two
tribes
are
imposing
the
severe
penalty
of
excommunication.
One
is
the
Lummi
Indian
reservation
in
Bellingham,
Washington,
and
the
other
the
Chippewa
of
Grand
Portage,
Minn.
The
tribal
councils
on
both
reservations
have
reached
back
to
ancient
laws
that
allows
the
tribe
to
expel
members
who
threaten
the
community.
Also
on
the
Chippewa
list
of
failings
that
can
lead
to
banishment
are
being
in
a
gang,
selling
drugs,
harming
the
band's
cultural
items,
disrupting
a
religious
ceremony,
unauthorized
hunting
or
fishing
and
being
banished
from
another
reservation.
Indian
tribes
are
sovereign
states,
legally
not
under
the
jurisdiction
of
the
Constitution
of
the
United
States,
and
have
the
right
to
act
in
ways
that
U.S.
citizens
might
find
in
direct
opposition
to
fundamental
rights.
|
The Children's
Children's Children are being protected by the Tribal Community |
|
Lummi Warrior
"Twisted Feather" |
Poverty
and unemployment on the reservations have driven many members to drug
dealing. Attempts to limit the crimes by conventional
methods have met with little results, so the tribal councils in both
the Lummi and Chippewa communities have resorted to the brutal
expulsion of those who threaten the community.
The Times reports the sadness of those ejected from the tribe.
One woman sleeps in cellars in the "white man's" land, begging for
food and clothing.
Tribal spokespeople say the harsh
penalty is being installed to protect the community at large.
The community at large, I assume,
means the Children's Children's Children. In one of the
examples illustrated in the Times story, an 15-month-old died after
eating an OxyContin pill on the floor, dropped by the drug dealer who
lived there.
As Sentinels of Vigilance, all
of us have a responsibility to defend the rights of our children,
especially to protect their safety. The reservations
that have installed the excommunication, banishment, penalty, are
telling their tribal members that "those who dance with the Beast of
Terror must live with him, walk in his shoes, sleep in his slime."
|
Sentinels of
Vigilance have a responsibility to defend the rights of all
children |
However cruel
the ejection of a person may be from a community, in one sense it
tells the world how important the whole is to the singular.
When individuals violate community
laws, and threaten the future of the children and their offspring,
they become cancerous. The idea the community will
condone such behavior by trying to repair it through therapy and
counseling is one thing if it works. The idea the
community will not condone such behavior is another.
|
Fewer of the
Chippewa children will want to Dance With The Beast of Terror |
Those quick to
criticize the Indian community for banishment might look at our child
molestation laws. Child molesters are banished by
our society. By law, their pictures are plastered around
neighborhoods. They register by law so their presence can be
noted. Citizens can access their addresses.
Banishment exists.
As a Sentinel of Vigilance I
look upon the Indian Reservations who employ banishment with applause
and sorrow. I applauded the effort to stop the
flow of drugs and crime within the community, and am saddened that
Vigilance to stop the crimes was not installed prior to the current
harsh penalty.
I believe if we all become Parents of
Vigilance and act within the Principles of Vigilance, that fewer of
our children will grow into adults who want to Dance With The Beast of
Terror.
When that happens, fewer of them will be
banished from the Tribe, the Tribe of Vigilance.
©2001
-
2004,
VigilanceVoice.com,
All
rights
reserved
-
a
((HYYPE))
design
Jan 17--Mind Melding
With A Parent Of Vigilance
|
|
|